127
Mr. Pakurer
legal
ask no to book wits the
午
"In (B), Soy basis of denial action. Judging for para. 2 (ii) of the draft despatch to Hong Kong, from park. 2 of the despatch to the
at (3), this has already
as well
Fed. of Malaya dme; indeed, I cannot imagine
with out dring
gove
have whether we
S.
for
have
grin
fo.
вил
we shed.
But
the foremos an crews,
we dearly have to Sin H.
is not
1. Gurney two remarks of the Governor's
in eater communication suggest he is
bit fraged.
In that case,
to state the position
So clear;
me
probably
night
Lovenor in you
Can
say
we
this art
we have moti
ว
agree
in the draft
whether we have told thes
su the legal position; &. if
whether there are
ما
Burma
pp.
analogy
Mr. by oberly's Beene John setting down 't seem likely to help greatly;
between the Sed. of halaya a bite the
help
portion may differ, since whe
protected state (alth
Settlements count
من
is a
Colony
the two
(although colony). DMK ilmus
27/10
that hi Moberly,
m2 Kirkener
letter makes
15
seems
which
I have
two points
marked A and B.
As regards A,
this is avered
No. 3 (which was approved by
Adviser);
by A of
скр
Legal
und para 2(ii) of the draft
despatch enclosed
To HK will
No.6.
The despatch
also enclose
a
copy of
No.3.
A
Admittedly it of No 13
them
A of
No.3
is the same, namely
was
haken
со
more prease
but the effect
that
if "achon
under Defence lépilation
(and corresponding legal clann
a
'compensation regulating) be established, falls
way
othenerse the las
on
Page
Page
Lee
in
Owner of the property, subject of
分
ग
any of gratia
Compensation scheme.
award
war
course
of compereration
damage
under a
Jeneral
As regards
B of
No.13
when
Mr Moberly spoke
which
To me
the only pout he mentined
raised the point with
connection
was
I
Mr Dale
with the Western Pacife
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.